Friday, December 16, 2005

Wikisdom

Some days, I love Tycho so much it hurts me inside:


Reponses to criticism of Wikipedia go something like this: the first is usually a paean to that pure democracy which is the project's noble fundament. If I don't like it, why don't I go edit it myself? To which I reply: because I don't have time to babysit the Internet. Hardly anyone does. If they do, it isn't exactly a compliment.

Any persistent idiot can obliterate your contributions. The fact of the matter is that all sources of information are not of equal value, and I don't know how or when it became impolitic to suggest it. In opposition to the spirit of Wikipedia, I believe there is such a thing as expertise.

The second response is: the collaborative nature of the apparatus means that the right data tends to emerge, ultimately, even if there is turmoil temporarily as dichotomous viewpoints violently intersect. To which I reply: that does not inspire confidence. In fact, it makes the whole effort even more ridiculous. What you've proposed is a kind of quantum encyclopedia, where genuine data both exists and doesn't exist depending on the precise moment I rely upon your discordant fucking mob for my information.


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

That is excellent. Wikipedia is rather accurate when it comes to phonology (from what I've seen), but I haven't seen what it says about some of the more debatable topics in the field.

Either way, I have the tendency to not rely on online encyclopedias. It's asking for trouble.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.